Q: Referring to
A: That cost is minimal. If you happened to listen to the briefing in the U.S. Congress or in other Parliaments of small countries that participate, such as
Q: But they’re rather well-off economically.
A: The figure of the €6.5 million that I mentioned in Parliament yesterday is the cost of
Q: Is there any benefit for
A: How can you be asking that? Imagine what would happen if Greece did not participate in the operation, how much prestige it would have lost at an international level, how the island of Crete would be of less importance, how the country’s strategic importance would be lower.
How could then
Q: So, there will be a diplomatic role for
A: Wouldn’t the role of other neighboring countries have been upgraded too then? The Greek people contradict themselves as a society and I must say that the public statements of those who shape public opinion contradict themselves as well: [They say that] Greece does not want Turkey to have an upgraded international role, they want Greece to have the strongest possible international role. But at the same time, they do have reservations on whether the country should participate in the EU, NATO and UN mainstreams.
They don’t want us to actively participate in operations of an offensive nature [in Libya] but they are saddened by the fact that the Italian CAOC took over the command of the air operations against Libya, despite the fact that Larissa’s CAOC has a supporting role since 78% of the forces deployed are in Italy and France and only 22% of them in Greece.
Greeks want all that to take place simultaneously, without the country being able to balance itself though. That is not the way to exercise foreign policy.